Skip to main content
The Timeline
Menu
Sign inTry one project

How Timeline works

From scattered work to a cited answer.

See how selected work becomes source-linked history, working records, and evidence-backed answers—without replacing the tools your team already uses.

The platform flow

How scattered work becomes useful context.

Sources become history, working records and verifiable answers.

01 / Evidence

Events stream in as evidence

Chats, files, meetings and system events keep their source.

  • ConversationsTelegram groups · Slack channels · forwarded email
  • Meetings & documentsLaunch review · Document Drive baseline
  • Delivery & incidentsGitHub changes · Sentry issues

+ Any source via a pre-built integration or webhook

Only sources your team selects or sends enter.

02 / Timeline

Events join The Timeline

Timestamped, source-linked and kept in order.

  1. [01]Telegram group
    Customer update due Friday
  2. [03]Meeting
    SSO remains the launch blocker
  3. [04]Document Drive
    Staged rollout plan added
  4. [06]GitHub
    SSO callback merged
  5. [07]Sentry
    Login issue regressed in staging

Original evidence stays attached.

03 / Workspace

Build useful records from history

History becomes records your team can run.

  • ProjectAcme rolloutAt risk · Priya · Review FriStatus update
  • TaskValidate SSOBlocked · Priya · Due FriNew task
  • CRMAcme + Maya ChenImplementation · Product leadExisting records linked
  • DecisionStage the launch18-team beta · Decided TueDecision record
Use the same records in

CRM · Task boards · Issue tracking · Calendar · Document Drive

04 / Assistants

Ask in Timeline—or your own agent

Web, chat and your own agent use the same evidence.

  • Web
  • Slack
  • Telegram
  • Own agent via MCP
You

What blocks launch, what is due next, and does the CRM agree?

Timeline

SSO still blocks launch [03][07]. Customer update due Friday [01].

CRM: On track ↔ Timeline: Blocked. Review before updating.

Live CRM via MCP · Claude · Codex · Any MCP client

Sources stay attached.Timeline record changes need approval.Enabled MCP tools can read or update connected systems such as your CRM.

02Evidence path

Trace one answer to its evidence.

Three source records become one answer you can verify.

Illustrative Acme rollout queryFictional Acme example, not customer data.

Question

What changed in the Acme rollout plan, and what is still undecided?

01 / SlackMon / 09:14

Maya Chen approves the onboarding copy in #acme-rollout.

02 / Google DriveTue / 15:40

The migration checklist records Friday’s review and Priya Shah as owner.

03 / SlackWed / 11:05

The rollout thread says pricing language is still open.

Answer / cited3 sources

The review date and owner are set; pricing is still unresolved.

The migration review is due Friday with Priya Shah as owner. The latest Acme rollout discussion still leaves pricing language open. Source citation 01Source citation 02Source citation 03

  1. 01Copy approved
  2. 02Review assigned
  3. 03Open pricing question

03Practical walkthroughs

Start with a question your team already knows how to verify.

These examples show the method on three common cross-tool questions. The sources stay distinct, and every conclusion keeps its evidence attached.

01

Slack + Google Drive

How to search Slack and Google Drive together

A practical workflow for turning shared Slack conversations and newly captured Google Drive files into one visibility-aware, cited answer.

Read walkthrough02

Slack + Linear + GitHub

How to create weekly engineering and project updates from Slack, Linear, and GitHub

A source-aware method for compiling decisions, movement, shipped work, blockers, and next steps without flattening three systems into one status list.

Read walkthrough03

Sentry + GitHub + Slack

How to connect Sentry incidents to releases, discussions, and fixes

A chronology-first incident workflow that uses Sentry, GitHub, and Slack evidence while keeping correlation, hypothesis, and confirmed cause distinct.

Read walkthrough

Start with the answer

Start with one project and one question.

Use one project, the smallest useful source set, and a question whose answer you can check against the original work.

Try one real projectRead the first walkthrough